| |
|
|
| |
Reliability |
|
| |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Thermal Simulation Comparison |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Dielectrics Thermal Conductivity
|
Dielectrics Thermal Conductivity
|
|
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
A computational Fluid Dynamics simulation Model was developed using a total of 12.5W LEDs mounted on the SuperMCPCB vs. on conventional MCPCB (thermal conductivity of dielectric: 8mW/K). MCPCB dimension: 30mm x 30 mm. A finned-type heat sink (150mm x 150mm) made of anodized extruded aluminum are attached to both modules. The result shows that SuperMCPCB provides excellent thermal conduction and offers lower Ti by at least 25¢J compared with that of conventional MCPCBs. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Thermal Measurement Set-up |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
A continuous temperature measurement of metal core using packages LEDs mounted on the SuperMCPCB and conventional MCPCB respectively. No external heat sink is attached. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Heat Conduction Comparison |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
The diagram shows that the temperature of Super MCPCB rises quickly and exhibits much lower thermal resistance compared to that of MCPCB.
|
|
| |
 |
The result shows that the temperature of SuperMCPCB rises quickly and exhibits much lower thermal resistance compared to that of conventional MCPCB. After 172 seconds of light-up, the temperature reading of super MCPCB reaches 82¢J whereas the temperature reading of conventional MCPCB only reaches 43¢J. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|